🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, governments are investing enormous sums into the concept of “sovereign AI” – building national AI technologies. Starting with the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, nations are vying to create AI that comprehends local languages and local customs.

The International AI Arms Race

This movement is part of a wider worldwide contest dominated by tech giants from the United States and the People's Republic of China. Whereas organizations like a leading AI firm and a social media giant allocate massive resources, mid-sized nations are also placing their own bets in the AI field.

However amid such huge sums in play, can developing countries attain notable gains? According to a specialist from a prominent policy organization, “Unless you’re a affluent nation or a major company, it’s a substantial hardship to develop an LLM from the ground up.”

Defence Considerations

Numerous states are unwilling to rely on overseas AI technologies. In India, for example, Western-developed AI systems have occasionally proven inadequate. An illustrative example featured an AI agent deployed to teach students in a distant community – it interacted in English with a strong American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for local students.

Then there’s the state security factor. In India’s defence ministry, employing particular international AI tools is considered not permissible. Per an developer explained, There might be some random data source that could claim that, for example, Ladakh is outside of India … Using that certain model in a military context is a major risk.”

He continued, I’ve discussed with people who are in the military. They want to use AI, but, setting aside certain models, they don’t even want to rely on US systems because data may be transferred abroad, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

Homegrown Projects

As a result, several nations are funding local ventures. A particular such project is in progress in India, in which a company is working to develop a domestic LLM with state support. This effort has allocated roughly 1.25 billion dollars to artificial intelligence advancement.

The expert foresees a model that is more compact than premier systems from Western and Eastern firms. He explains that the nation will have to offset the financial disparity with skill. Located in India, we don’t have the option of allocating billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we vie with for example the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the America is investing? I think that is the point at which the fundamental knowledge and the intellectual challenge comes in.”

Local Emphasis

In Singapore, a government initiative is supporting language models educated in the region's regional languages. Such languages – for example Malay, the Thai language, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, Khmer and additional ones – are commonly underrepresented in Western-developed LLMs.

I wish the experts who are creating these sovereign AI systems were aware of just how far and the speed at which the frontier is advancing.

A leader engaged in the project notes that these tools are created to complement more extensive models, rather than substituting them. Systems such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he states, frequently struggle with local dialects and cultural aspects – speaking in unnatural Khmer, for instance, or proposing non-vegetarian meals to Malay individuals.

Creating local-language LLMs allows local governments to include cultural nuance – and at least be “smart consumers” of a sophisticated technology built elsewhere.

He adds, “I’m very careful with the term sovereign. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we want to be better represented and we want to understand the features” of AI systems.

International Collaboration

Regarding countries seeking to find their place in an growing worldwide landscape, there’s an alternative: collaborate. Analysts associated with a well-known university put forward a government-backed AI initiative distributed among a alliance of developing states.

They term the proposal “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, in reference to Europe’s effective strategy to create a rival to Boeing in the mid-20th century. The plan would involve the creation of a government-supported AI organization that would merge the resources of different nations’ AI programs – for example the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, the Canadian government, Germany, the nation of Japan, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to create a strong competitor to the US and Chinese leaders.

The main proponent of a report setting out the concept states that the idea has drawn the interest of AI officials of at least a few states to date, as well as a number of state AI firms. While it is now targeting “developing countries”, less wealthy nations – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda among them – have likewise expressed interest.

He explains, In today’s climate, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s reduced confidence in the assurances of this current US administration. People are asking like, should we trust these technologies? What if they choose to